Pardon Our Dust
We recently launched this new site and are still in the process of updating some of our archived content. Some details of this article may be incomplete, links may be broken, and other elements may not display properly yet. We appreciate your patience and understanding.
Press Conference and Possible Veto
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015, Senate Majority Leader Harry Brown (R-Onslow) held a bipartisan press conference touting his plan to change the distributionmethod of local sales taxes in North Carolina. Sen. Brown stated in his press conference that he was joined by 40 rural counties and that there may havebeen more to join him had he had more time.
Under Sen. Brown’s tax redistribution plan, sales tax money would be distributed based mostly on population rather than where the sales occur. Under thecurrent distribution model, 75 percent of the sales tax goes to the county and city where the purchase is made, while 25 percent is distributed across thestate based on population. Sen. Brown’s proposal would shift the distribution gradually over the next 5 years, so that effective July 1, 2019, 20 percentwould be distributed to the county or city where the purchase is made, while 80 percent would be distributed across the state based on population.Currently Sen. Brown’s tax plan is included in Senate Bill 369, Sales Tax Fairness Act, and at the end of the Senate’s proposed budget.
Also on Tuesday, Governor McCrory issued a press release stating he would veto SenatorBrown’s tax redistribution proposal. In the press release Governor McCrory stated, “[SB 369] will result in a tax increase for millions of hard workingmiddle-class families and small business owners throughout North Carolina.” He further stated, “This legislation will decimate our travel and tourismsector, particularly in our mountain and beach communities, shop owners and their employees who depend on tourism for their livelihood. Instead of pursuingleft-wing ideas that continually fail, it’s time for the General Assembly to get to work on job creation for all North Carolina.”
The plan has not passed the House chamber. Because Senator Brown’s redistribution tax proposal was included in Senate’s budget proposal, House Bill 97, the Senate chamber passed the plan when itpassed its budget proposal.
On July 14, Sen. Tom Apodaca (R-Henderson) announced on the floor of the Senate leadership planned to wrap up committee meetings by last Thursday, July 23.The Senate held 14 committee meetings last week and have not scheduled any further committees to meet this week. Although Senate committees be held on an“as needed” basis, there will no longer be regularly scheduled Senate committee meetings.
It is not unusual at this point in the session for the chambers to stop holding regularly scheduled committee meetings in order to focus work on the budgetnegotiations. However, there has not yet been an announcement made by the House that House committees intend to wrap up soon.
House Appropriations hear public comment on HB 97
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 the House Appropriations committee heard public comment on the Senate’s proposed budget. Mayors from across the state expressedsupport regarding funding for transportation, historic tax credits, and JDIG. While several school superintendents expressed the need for additionalprincipal and assistant principal pay, restoration of the Master’s degree program, TA funding, and driver education funding.
The committee will again hear public comment this Wednesday, July 29, 2015.
See Fiscal Research’s presentation given in committeehere.
Regulatory Reform Bill goes to Conference
The House failed to concur in the Senate’s regulatory reform bill, HB 765, Regulatory Reform Act of 2015, on Wednesday, July 22, 2015 after hearing publiccomment the day before in committee on the bill. The House wasted no time, appointing conferees the same day. The Senate appointed conferees on Monday,July 27, 2015. Rep. Pat McElraft (R-Carteret) and Sen. Trudy Wade (R-Guildford) will chair the committee.
Transportation Network Company Bill
On Thursday the Senate passed SB 541, Regulate Transportation Network Companies, 41-5. The bill would establishregulations on a transportation network company (“TNC”). A brokering transportation network company is defined as “a transportation network company … thatexclusively dispatches TNC drivers that operate either … for‑hire passenger vehicles regulated under G.S. 160A‑304” or “for‑hire passenger vehiclesregulated under G.S. 62‑260(f) and subject to the requirements for security for protection of the public and safety of operation established for regulatedmotor common carriers.” This definition would include companies such as Uber, Lyft, and Sidecar.
The bill requires TNCs to obtain permits and pay an annual renewal fee, both at a cost of $5,000 each. TNCs must also conduct local and national criminalbackground checks on TNC drivers. The bill is sponsored by Sen. Floyd McKissick (D-Durham) and Sen. Bill Rabon (R-Brunswick). SB 541 is supported by Uberand Lyft.
Read Senate Bill 541 here.
Charter School Authority Bill
On Thursday, the Senate passed, 32-14, HB 334, Transfer Officeof Charter Schools. The bill makes several changes in the state’s oversight of charters schools. It establishes the Office of Charter Schools under theState Board of Education (SBOE), instead of under the Department of Public Instruction (DPI), modifies the charter school advisory board, and enhances thecharter school application process.
Sen. Jerry Tillman (R-Randolph) presented the bill in the Senate Education committee on Wednesday. Sen. Tillman stated that charter schools offeralternatives to public schools and he is in favor of removing impediments that interfere with that choice. Sen. Josh Stein (D-Wake) opposed the transferfrom the DPI to the SBOE.
The House passed HB 334 on April 21, 2015, 112-2. Because the Senate madechanges to the bill, the House will now vote on concurrence to the Senate’s changes.
Read House Bill 334 here.
On Thursday, the Senate passed SB 605, Various Changes to the Revenue Laws, that makes numerous changes to the state’s revenue laws. Most of the changesare minor, but one change is being opposed by Lt. Governor Dan Forest. The provision would repeal check-off boxes on tax returns that make contributions toN.C. Education Endowment Fund, an education endowment that rewards good teachers. Further provisions are as follows:
Part I addresses business tax change and includes eliminations of several deductions from the corporate and franchise tax laws that the Senate has deemed“antiquated or obsolete,” such as: deductions for marketing assessments on tobacco grown in NC, interest and gains of a trust resulting from the tobaccosettlement, and amounts paid from the Hurricane Floyd Reserve Fund and Disaster Relief Reserve Fund for hurricane relief. Corporate income tax changeswould be effective for taxable years on or after January 1, 2016. Franchise tax changes would be effective for taxable years beginning or after January 1,2017. These changes are also included in the Senate’s proposed budget, the seventh edition to House Bill 97.
Part III addresses changes to sales tax and includes the repeal of the sales tax exemption for items sold by a nonprofit organization when the receiptsfrom the sale of the item will be directly or indirectly contributed to the State or school (i.e. a museum gift shop).
Part IV addresses changes to the excise tax and includes a provision that authorizes wine shippers to file excise tax returns on shipments once a year,rather than monthly.
Warrantless Cell Phone Search
On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary I committee passed HB 804, Kelsey Smith Act. The bill would permit “warrantless access by law enforcement totelecommunications device location information under certain circumstances.”
Under the bill, a wireless service provider would be required by law to provide call location information of a user to the law enforcement agency or publicsafety answering point, upon request. The bill also authorizes a law enforcement officer to install and use a pen register or trap and trace device,without first obtaining a warrant, when the officer determines either an emergency situation exists that involves immediate danger of death or seriousbodily injury and there are grounds upon which an order could be entered to authorize such an installation and use. The officer must then seek an orderapproving the installation or use within 48 hours.
The bill passed the house 118-2on April 29, 2015. The bill is scheduled be heard on the Senate floor this evening, July 27, 2015.
Read House Bill 804 here.
Death Penalty Changes
On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary II committee reported out favorably HB 774, Restoring Proper Justice Act. The bill amends the law requiring the presenceof a licensed physician at the execution of a death sentence by also allowing a medical professional other than a physician, including a physicianassistant, nurse practitioner, registered nurse, emergency medical technician (EMT), or EMT-paramedic, to monitor the injection of the required lethalsubstances and certify the fact of the execution. However, if a licensed physician is not present at the execution, a licensed physician is required toexamine the body after the execution and pronounce the person dead.
The bill is scheduled to be heard on the Senate floor this evening, July 27, 2015. The bill passed the House 84-33.
Read House Bill 774 here.
SB 22, Historic Artifact Mgt. and Patriotism Act, was signed by the Governor on Thursday, July 23, 2015. The bill seeks to ensure respectful treatment ofthe American flag and the North Carolina flag by establishing a division as the clearing house for the disposal of worn, tattered, and damaged flags.
However, the controversial part of the bill is the provisions that seek to protect monuments and memorials commemorating events, persons, and militaryservice in North Carolina history. Gov. McCrory stated in a press release “Ourmonuments and memorials reminds us of North Carolina’s complete story.” He further stated, “I remain committed to ensuring that our past, present andfuture state monuments tell the complete story of North Carolina. While I disagree with the process created in the bill and the overreach into localdecision making, the overall goals of the bill merit my signature.”
Read Senate Bill 22 here.